When I went on a business trip a few weeks ago, I opted out (again) of the TSA’s scanners, and wondered: Is it just me, or have the pat downs become even more invasive? Instead of terrorists hiding bombs in their nether regions or shoes, have they taken to hiding them in their armpits? (Insert your own joke about armpits and the TSA.) It’s an unpleasant situation, but at least I haven’t been subjected to even worse behavior on the part of the agency.
Meanwhile, the head of the TSA refuses to testify before the (are you ready for this?) House subcommittee on aviation. Yes, aviation, as in airplanes and airports, where 99 percent of TSA employees currently (or should) work. A committee on aviation composed of politicians who are responsible for doling out the dollars the TSA depends on sounds like a “must visit” location for any TSA chief. But if he’s shy, why doesn’t the committee issue a subpoena? It would certainly be a more legitimate use of the hearing process than badgering pro athletes over their use of steroids.
Is there hope for some sensible policies and accountability? I’m not sure, but Christopher Elliot gives five reasons to opt out of “microwave” screening. He further predicts that the TSA as we know it will soon be dead.
I’d like to think so, but there’s nothing as permanent as a government program.
First published by the Michigan View